Mischler v. Commonwealth 08-CI-1039: General Factual Basis for Complaint

[Editorial note: This starts as an mudane child support/custody issue. However, it escalates into Organized Crime when Stumbo, as sitting Attorney General sanctions the false arrest/kidnapping under the color of law of the Plaintiff by the County Attorney to cover up official misconduct of not one, but two individuals who either they, or their spouse gave campaign contributions to Greg Stumbo]

GENERAL FACTUAL BASIS FOR COMPLAINT

I. JUNE 2005 UNTIL APRIL 2006: DEFENDANTS HALL FAILURE TO PROSECUTE CHILD SUPPORT AGAINST DEFENDANT STEVENS.
26. The Plaintiff filed for child support prosecution against Stevens in June 2005.

27. Hall’s agents Tammy Branham sent an email to Shelia Bryant on June 29, 2005 requesting guidance of how to proceed. See Exhibit 1.

28. Hall stopped his office from filing for child support prosecution against Stevens. Hall and Stevens are both members of the Kentucky Bar Association and are long time personal friends since childhood.

29. Hall's office refused to meet with the Plaintiff. Standard operating procedure is that the child support meets with the client before filing any documents.

30. The Plaintiff discovered that Stevens had cancelled the two minor children's health insurance at an unknown date. Unable to afford insurance, the Plaintiff properly applied for state health insurance KCHIP for the two minor children on November 29, 2005. The children qualified under the Plaintiffs financial situation. See Exhibit 2.

31. To cover the malfeasance of the Pike County Child Support office; Hall had assistant attorney Kyle Deskins file a motion for child support and KCHIP insurance against Stevens on November 29 2005 which is the official date in the Court records. Hall’s agent Deskins falsified the certification as November 28, 2005 to cover up Hall’s prior malfeasance. No date was set when the motion would be heard. The motion has never been heard. Further, Deskins filed this without the Pike County Child Support Office ever meeting with the Plaintiff. See Exhibit 3.

32. The Plaintiff filed a motion in response correcting inaccuracies of Deskins motion and noticing the Court of Halls failure to move forward with the child support prosecution and Hall conflict of interest in prosecuting his personal friend, Stevens. See Exhibit 4.

33. Hall immediately filed a notice that his office would be withdrawing. However, Hall never followed up with a motion to withdraw. Nor was any judicial order issued granting withdrawal by the Pike County Attorney. See Exhibit 5

34. Hall did nothing to move to the child support prosecution forward from November 2005 to April 2006.

35. The Pike County Family Court refused to set the motions on the dockets.[1]



[1] Judge Thompson of the Pike County Family Court is one of a handful of judges who sets his own docket. If he does not set the motion on the docket, it does not get heard in his court.

[Editor Note: The Exhibits document the allegations themselves and can be viewed
at http://www.box.net/shared/taf165uvxi or at http://pikecountyinjusticefilesdocuments.blogspot.com/2008/09/mischler-v-commonwealth-08-ci-1039_19.html ]