Thursday, September 26, 2019
Monday, September 23, 2019
Friday, June 07, 2019
Saturday, February 16, 2019
In case you are bored
In the industry it's known as controlled opposition.
By regular folks it's called being sold out by your attorney.
Did Kent Wicker have fun representing Eric Conn in the qui tam while my ex husband, Attorney Jonah Lee Stevens was representing co-counsel in the same qui tam?
Did Joseph Lambert have fun representing Eric Conn in the criminal case while my ex husband attorney Jonah Lee Stevens sold out representing co-counsel in the same case to the detriment of his client. The shrink should have made the first plea deal but you know attorneys gotta protect attorneys. [Lambert was co defendant with my ex husband in a law suit I filed- are there only a handful of attorneys in KY, statically speaking how can the same people be involved?]
Now I have wonder to myself, was Kent Wicker controlled opposition in the Eric Grider case? Is that part of why Griders were having so many issues getting a baseless criminal case dismissed???
And, was Kent Wicker controlled opposition originally with Judge Steven Combs? Wicker's mistakes at the JCC proceedings at the beginning just about ruined Judge Combs. Thankfully, Combs took my unsolicited advice on topix and got new legal counsel to replace Wicker.
Now lets talk JCC, the Judicial Conduct Commission in Kentucky. Of course, I disclosed it's issues in my lawsuit where Lambert was a defendant. It's a whitewashing non bid contract entity which for many years was ran out of the basement of a home of the executive secretary. Before the Combs case was ever filed at the JCC; I had already put on public record that the JCC was politically targeting judges.
But the most interesting question I have tonight is how many cases does Judge Van Tatenhove rule in for Kent Wicker clients like Judge Van Tatenhove was ruling for Bevin before I disclosed the conflict of interest that Bevin/Van Tatenhove had?
By regular folks it's called being sold out by your attorney.
Did Kent Wicker have fun representing Eric Conn in the qui tam while my ex husband, Attorney Jonah Lee Stevens was representing co-counsel in the same qui tam?
Did Joseph Lambert have fun representing Eric Conn in the criminal case while my ex husband attorney Jonah Lee Stevens sold out representing co-counsel in the same case to the detriment of his client. The shrink should have made the first plea deal but you know attorneys gotta protect attorneys. [Lambert was co defendant with my ex husband in a law suit I filed- are there only a handful of attorneys in KY, statically speaking how can the same people be involved?]
Now I have wonder to myself, was Kent Wicker controlled opposition in the Eric Grider case? Is that part of why Griders were having so many issues getting a baseless criminal case dismissed???
And, was Kent Wicker controlled opposition originally with Judge Steven Combs? Wicker's mistakes at the JCC proceedings at the beginning just about ruined Judge Combs. Thankfully, Combs took my unsolicited advice on topix and got new legal counsel to replace Wicker.
Now lets talk JCC, the Judicial Conduct Commission in Kentucky. Of course, I disclosed it's issues in my lawsuit where Lambert was a defendant. It's a whitewashing non bid contract entity which for many years was ran out of the basement of a home of the executive secretary. Before the Combs case was ever filed at the JCC; I had already put on public record that the JCC was politically targeting judges.
But the most interesting question I have tonight is how many cases does Judge Van Tatenhove rule in for Kent Wicker clients like Judge Van Tatenhove was ruling for Bevin before I disclosed the conflict of interest that Bevin/Van Tatenhove had?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)