Assistant Deputy Attorney General Janet M. Graham, who is also the Prosecutors Advisory Council has confirmed that Chief Justice Lambert is correct on the AOC site that the Prosecutors Advisory council does have jurisdiction to investigate county attorneys.
Please note, that in a former posting Attorney General Greg Stumbo stated that he did not have jurisdiction ( http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3320/3903/1600/AGLetter.jpg )when I requested an investigation of Pike County Attorney, Howard Keith Hall who is a personal friend and campaign contributor of Stumbo.
In response to the open records request, (http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3320/3903/1600/openrecordrequest.jpg) Graham sent the following letter, scanned and posted online.
Here are the key points.
1) The Prosecutors Advisory Council does have jurisdiction to investigate grievances against prosecutors.
2)Graham, an deputy assistant attorney general with the constitutional duty to enforce open records request, failed to comply with the open records request.
3) Graham, an attorney licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, attempts to use legalese to state that it is the Judges responsibility to investigate corrupt prosecutors.
However, as a member of the Kentucky Bar it is imputed upon Graham that she knows that Judges cannot do an investigation of a party in a proceeding. Such an investigation would violate several of the judicial canons, including "CANON 3: A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY"(1)
Is Graham requesting that Judge Johnson and Judge Preston violated the judicial canon? And if they did, would the attorney generals office be required to investigate Johnson and Preston under public corruption??
Oh what tangled webs we weave, when once we conspire to deceive.
And, I just love the introductory paragraph where Graham attempts to intimidate me and destroy my credibility from anyone who reads the letter by stating that I am charged with criminal and civil court cases.
If you check out the original open records request you will not read anywhere in it that I requests an investigation. That was an afterthought which I added to a yellow posty attached to the request.
Is this letter just another example of how the Attorney Generals Office is intentionally denying me my First Amendment right under the United States Constitution to redress the Government?1)http://www.sunethics.com/kycodejudconduct.htm
5 comments:
Post a Comment